Working together for a better justice system
News and Events > CJI News Archive > 2012 > April - June > Significant effort by NIPS but disappointment at overall pace of change
News and Events
Latest News Latest News
Press Releases Press Releases
Speeches and Presentations Speeches and Presentations
Events Events
CJI News Archive CJI News Archive
     2016 2016
     2015 2015
     2014 2014
     2013 2013
     2012 2012
          October - December October - December
          July - September July - September
          April - June April - June
          January - March January - March
     2011 2011
     2010 2010
     2009 2009
     2008 2008
     2007 2007
     2006 2006
Photograph Library Photograph Library

Significant effort by NIPS but disappointment at overall pace of change


Significant effort by NIPS but disappointment at overall pace of change

03/04/2012
The Criminal Justice Inspection Northern Ireland in a follow-up to a report, published in November 2010 into mistaken prisoner releases, has stated that there has been significant effort by the Northern Ireland Prison Service (NIPS) however there is disappointed at the overall pace of change.    

There has been a further four erroneous releases since the initial report.
 
“Encouraging work has taken place where additional focus and resources have been applied. For example, the NIPS has expended significant effort and finance to IT solutions. This is in addition to linking the issue of erroneous releases to the Strategic Effectiveness and Efficiency (SEE) Programme,” said Dr Michael Maguire, chief inspector Criminal Justice Inspection. “However work has been focused on longer term process re-engineering and fundamentally neglected the immediacy of the ongoing risks.”
 
Of the 25 NIPS recommendations in the follow up report, 14 (56%) can now be said to be met in full. A further 10 (40%) can be said to be partly completed and one (4%) as discharged (no longer relevant).
 
“Well over one-third of the recommendations made have not been met in full some 15 months after the first report. For example, it is disappointing that formal training for front line staff has still not been delivered, with the most notable for Duty Governors who are expected to authorise final release.
 
“There is also a need for job guidance and a continued focus on the full implementation of existing controls by way of supervision and quality checks. Compliance and quality assurance with robust mechanisms must be sustained.
 
“Both the operational and strategic focus needs to be maintained on the issues, and ultimately, the accelerated completion of all the outstanding recommendations.”


Top of Page