Working together for a better justice system
News and Events > CJI News Archive > 2012 > April - June > Further progress needed from Public Prosecution Service on giving reasons for its decisions
News and Events
Latest News Latest News
Press Releases Press Releases
Speeches and Presentations Speeches and Presentations
Events Events
CJI News Archive CJI News Archive
     2016 2016
     2015 2015
     2014 2014
     2013 2013
     2012 2012
          October - December October - December
          July - September July - September
          April - June April - June
          January - March January - March
     2011 2011
     2010 2010
     2009 2009
     2008 2008
     2007 2007
     2006 2006
Photograph Library Photograph Library

Further progress needed from Public Prosecution Service on giving reasons for its decisions


Further progress needed from Public Prosecution Service on giving reasons for its decisions

17/05/2012
“We found that the PPS has taken important steps forward in the development of its policies and procedures regarding the giving of reasons to victims on prosecution decisions and found many examples of good practice,” said Deputy Chief Inspector, Criminal Justice Inspection Northern Ireland, Brendan McGuigan.

“However, the inspection did find that operational practice could be improved and was not consistent across the organisation.”
 
The purpose of the Criminal Justice Inspection Northern Ireland report published today (Thursday 17 May 2012) – ‘Telling Them Why’ – An inspection of the Public Prosecution Service giving reasons for its decisions, was to consider whether there were effective, appropriate guidelines and mechanisms in place surrounding the policy and practice of the Public Prosecution Service on the giving of reasons.
 
Under the current PPS policy the offer to meet with victims/families concerning their cases and the decisions made, are a matter for discretion in individual cases. Inspectors found there was a paucity of such offers and the report recommends that offers to meet are regularly included in a range of more serious cases.
 
Inspectors also found that there was no automatic communication (in PPS correspondence) of the entitlement to ask for either more detailed reasons or of a formal review of the decision, albeit a leaflet on the role of the PPS was enclosed outlining the ability to ask for a review of a decision. 
 
“In addition, Inspectors found that current practice does not address the previous recommendations made by CJI in July 2007 that, save in exceptional circumstances, substantive reasons should be given to all victims. 
 
“We now repeat the recommendation that more detailed reasons are provided in all cases, where possible. There must also be a move to a greater level of openness, transparency, understanding and engagement in order to further augment trust and confidence.


Top of Page